Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Smoorenburg (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:47, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  17:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Smoorenburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NARTIST. Adam9007 (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've added a number of references to the article. The most important ones include this, this, and this news video. The difficulty with this guy though is that, due to his birth country and where he's worked, sources are really disparate across multiple languages and that makes them hard to locate. There are sources in Dutch from his homeland, sources in Chinese from his early martial arts films with Jackie Chan and others, sources in Thai for the various other martial arts movies he did in Thailand, and recently sources in Hindi and others for his work over the past few years in Bollywood films. SilverserenC 21:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.