Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandinavia and the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavia and the World

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had actually planned on writing an article about this subject, but I can't find any reliable third party sources at all on it, so it doesn't meet the GNG. There are two mentions of the webcomic in blog posts profiling a different work by the same artist ([1], [2]), but that's the closest that I can get to finding sources. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 09:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Much as this is my favourite webcomic site, I have to admit my fairly thorough (and at the time quite indignant) search reveals that this is definitely not notable. The only saving grace I can find is that it seems to be quite well-visited, although I fail to see how that could be notability. Delete as per the nominator, great site but not notable. RailwayScientist (talk) 21:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from the sources I've managed to find, it would be easier to write an article on Humon based on his gender roles cartoons than it would be to write an article on Scandinavia and the World. There's too little for either, though. Delete. ~Mable (chat) 15:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.