Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmasculine Definition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Trans man. Unanimous consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 07:47, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transmasculine Definition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its content is duplicated and worded much better in articles including gender dysphoria, transgender, transsexual, gender etc. DrStrauss talk 13:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~Redirect as per nom; to Trans man, as per User:Sandstein, as the most logical target, and one which, re: DrStrauss' remarks below, would be far more likely to be entered into a search engine. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: as a redirect? I don't think that very many people will type that in anyway and with "definition" it's not suited to WP WP:NOTDICTIONARY. DrStrauss talk 13:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I've adjusted my !v on reappraisal. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 16:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DrStrauss: You're right about typing that in! But, is there no salvageable maerial from it (to add to the object page) before redirecting? O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: if we're talking about properly sourced content then it's little, if any. DrStrauss talk 16:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Trans man, which is about the same topic, as far as I can tell as a layperson. Or to Transmasculine, if it turns out that there are differences. But this is clearly a content fork of either of the two. Sandstein 14:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect to where?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.