Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ila Pant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Note: the article needs cleanup. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 07:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ila Pant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NOTE, Self-promotion and publicity, not much in third party sources, only 1 time parliamentarian in past, Adamstraw99 (talk) 09:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Has been a member of parliament of India. If there are issues fix these by editing. Why delete?Shyamsunder (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per WP:POLITICIAN. Please consider checks and alternatives before nominating. Vipinhari || talk 11:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 11:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 11:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as it meets the first criterion at WP:NPOL. Uanfala (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep classic case of nominating without checking all the boxes FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Per WP:SKCRIT criteria 3. All current and former international, national and state/province-wide politicians are inherently notable per WP:NPOL. Agree with nom that clean-up is required but this does not achieve that. AusLondonder (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep if there is unsourced material, the article can be shortened ChunnuBhai (talk) 12:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.