Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 11:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

X (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable anime series. heavily ref bombed. 晚安 (トークページ) 10:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. 晚安 (トークページ) 10:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. 晚安 (トークページ) 10:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Did you check the references? There are several reviews listed (three random examples [1] [2] [3]). Jumpytoo Talk 17:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yes, i did. and i don't think they are reliable sources. 晚安 (トークページ) 06:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- All of the sources linked by Jumpytoo and that are currently used in the article (Mania, THEM Anime Reviews, DVD Talk, Anime News Network, etc) have WP:ANIME/RS been vetted and considered to be reliable sources. This is especially true for the latter, which is used in 90% of all animanga articles. Link20XX (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The series has enough coverage to warrant notability, and as mentioned above, the sources cited are considered reliable. - Xexerss (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't get the proposal. It's not a stub and all of its sources are considered reliable by guidelines and the project. In fact, some parts of this article were originally from the other X manga article which was split due size issues among other stuff.Tintor2 (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my above comment. Link20XX (talk) 02:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perfectly encyclopedic and relevant.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anime News Network is a reliable source. I clicked one of the links to them in the article and found a full review. https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/x-tv/dvd-3 There is a list of websites that count as reliable sources. There is even a custom search for Anime and Manga related things at [4] that only searches for websites listed as reliable sources. You can search for the name of this series as well as the writer to find results. Dream Focus 21:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per above. I see no reason to have this article deleted. Rin (talk) 23:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, and having enough reliable references. Jeni Wolf (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has extensive coverage across various WP:ANIME/RS sources. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above has reliable sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.