Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Craig Pennell
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:51, 24 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Craig Pennell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claim to fame is apparently that this person was "first living non-royal person depicted on a New Zealand stamp". (1968) There is no evidence it actually does depict Pennell, and even if it did the claim is verifiably false per this 1956 stamp where "The photograph was taken by Mr J F Louden of Tauranga of his grandchildren at play" and "The stamp designs were developed based on this photographic image". There is no in-depth coverage of Pennell to satisfy WP:GNG requirements and nothing of note within his article to pass inclusion criteria ClubOranjeT 11:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A Google search picked up nothing of note. -- Avenue (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Avenue (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - SimonLyall (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even if Pennell is the person on the stamp, the persons in the montage of photographs on this 1939 stamp would have a better claim to being the first. Daveosaurus (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.