Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon espinoza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon espinoza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This could almost be speedy deleted as purely promotional. There is a claim of importance but unfortunately, this football player does not meet the relevant notability guideline since he's never played in a fully professional league Pichpich (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - has never played at a fully pro level, the page is purely an advert/CV, can't find any evidence that this footballer even exists Spiderone 13:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.