Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devendra Kachhawaha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lack of WP:BEFORE. Clear pass of WP:JUDGE (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devendra Kachhawaha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable judge. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am relatively a new editor on Wikipedia, and so I studied the criteria of notability, and this is what I found:

Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians_and_judges

As per the clause - 1, a judge who has held an international, national or state level office in a country is presumed notable. Here, in this case the subject of the article has been an officer of the State Judicial Service throughout his service, till the age of 60 when he got appointed as the Judge of Rajasthan High Court (A court of original(in some cases) and appellate jurisdiction). The court is second from top in the heirarchy of the court and is a higher court of jurisdiction, the first being the Supreme Court of India.

Additionally, the total number of judges in the RHC is 28. The nomination of him was done by the Chief Justice of India and appointment by the President of India. More information and references regarding the same can be gathered by a simple google search of his name. That's all to be said in the matter. MahakMaatiDi (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as per User:MahakMaatiDi - I agree with his/her interpretation of WP:JUDGE. Yet another nomination lacking WP:BEFORE. Ingratis (talk) 22:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets notability for judges Spiderone 12:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MahakMaatiDi. --Yoonadue (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.