Jump to content

User talk:96.20.197.194

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Newslinger (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 6 April 2022 (General note: Using talk page as forum on Talk:Bucha massacre.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello, 96.20.197.194, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ahunt. I noticed that you recently removed content from People's Party of Canada without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.} Ahunt (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, 96.20.197.194. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page People's Party of Canada, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Ahunt. For someone with such experience, you seem to presume quite a lot, prejudicing the content of my character for no apparent reason other than, possibly, asserting your authority and what seem to be your bias (leftist maybe?). I explained clearly, with one sentence, the reasoning of my edit. Here's the exact quote of my edit summary that you decided to ignore : "These are opinions, not observable facts nor objective statements."
Now, what did I change, exactly? There's a table on the right defining the party, its ideology, political position and so on. This is a table that serve as definition, presentation, without context nor explanation. The party do not consider itself to be far-right, never declared itself to be far right and there's no documentation observing any actions that could help label them as such. BUT, there's opinions that the PPC is far right leaning, in some degree, or some of their members hold far right convictions. Opinion are not facts, though, and can't be considered when defining a political party. That is why I removed the "far right" mention in the table, but kept it in the article, since it is appropriate to mention it and discuss it, but not to label the party as such. You are wrongfully and ignorantly accusing me of pre-election sanitizing, but the party isn't eligible for the 44th Canadian federal election, and you don't even have the faintest clue if I am a participant of the Canadian election process. I am not. I do not work for the federal government, nor any government at all, I never have and I don't work in the public service and have never participated in any political events whatsoever. So there's absolutely no conflict of interest here.
Also worth noting that I have verified every sources where it is mentioned that the PPC is a far right party and these are all articles having opinions on the matter and not stating any facts substantiating that the PPC is actually a far right leaning party (according to the definition of "far right" in a political context).
Now I might be mistaken, since I am less experience than you are with Wikipedia edits, but I thought that Wikipedia had rigourous standards about sourcing the content of pages and substantiating any assertion, especially the one that hurt\libel the individual or the organization. I will have to leave it to you to clarify that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.20.197.194 (talkcontribs)
EDIT - This talk page is for discussion. If user Ahunt do not want to engage in a discussion toward resolving the issue, please abstain yourself from participating in the matter at hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.20.197.194 (talkcontribs)
EDIT 2 - Removal of Ahunt impertinent monologue, ignoring my comment above all together, like I haven't explained myself and imputing me intentions I never had (God complex?).

Controversial topic area alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 23:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:Bucha massacre are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 23:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.