Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Anaconda Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:58, 12 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Anaconda Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no evidence this book was every published (the last one was in 2003) and there's independent RS showing interest in the book. Nowhere near notable enough. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. Being serialized online at the publisher's website but that's not supporting the cause. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing notable here, just a storage room full of garbage.Jacona (talk) 01:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete doesn't appear to pass our book notability guidelines. I think it's telling that the publisher apparently didn't release a physical book of it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.