Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Lavery
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:12, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:12, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark Lavery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was that This page clearly fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD was contested without a reason being provided. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Shouldn't have to explain. Fails notability guidelines. – Michael (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of playing in a professional team, thus failing WP:NFOOTY. As for the PROD, with the best will in the world ArcticKangaroo, if you don't know how to properly contest a PROD you probably shouldn't be reviewing AFC submissions. Sorry. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.