Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maro Mavri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maro Mavri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly non-notable per WP:NMODEL. Quis separabit? 12:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails NMODEL + GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Speedy was declined because Mavri's main role in a Greek TV show qualifies as a claim to notability, and I'm inclined to agree and believe that this meets WP:NMODEL when factoring in IMDb's listed credits. The article obviously needs more sources, hence the "weak" part, but I don't speak Greek so I can't say for certain what's out there. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 20:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Role in TV show is not big enough to pass notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have to agree with the delete on the basis of a single role in a show. The other material is puzzling: she gave an interview to Maxim that she had been putting off because she was not used to posing erotically when she was a model, but she stopped being a model years earlier? Huh? Well, that's one interview in a ladmag and a role in a TV show. That's not quite there. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.