Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HinduKshatrana/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations‎ | HinduKshatrana

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JJMC89 (talk | contribs) at 02:37, 24 April 2022 (Archiving case section from w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HinduKshatrana (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


HinduKshatrana

HinduKshatrana (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

23 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Apparently resorted to sockpuppetry since he has been warned enough on his talk page for recent disruption.[1]

Compare the diffs here:

 Looks like a duck to me. Wareon (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

IP socking is continuing: Heheya Kingdom,[9][10] Abhira dynasty.[11][12]

Engaging in IP socking even after warning by GeneralNotability.[13] Abhishek0831996 (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Many of these accounts are blocked for socking while some are not, some seems like sleeper accounts, a year old with single digit edits and then sudden activity. Almost every accounts has some pages that are common and most account has activity only on those articles, nothing else. Some even have similar names like HinduKshatrana and KshatranaHindu. There has been quite a rise in socking and disruptive editing on Ahir caste related pages, atleast two separate SPI blocked quite a big group of them but I suspect these are also related to those accounts. Many accounts are created and then discarded after a few edits. Their usual target pages are Yaduvanshi Aheer, Hindu Ghosi, Jadaun, Ahirwal, Ahirwada, Ahir clans, Yadava, Ahir, Krishnaut, Ahar caste Gopa, Abhira tribe, Indian rebellion of 1857, Gadariya where all these accounts edits are mostly similar reverting or editing. This is quite a big arena, and many of the new socks are creating too much trouble on many pages, if a checkuser could run a check on them whether these blocked accounts are related to these other accounts or not. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - Sajaypal007, you've listed something like a dozen accounts. Several of them are blocked already under other sockpuppet investigations and others haven't edited in months, and your justification boils down to "interested in the same topic" which is not sufficient.
  • In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


  • KshatranaHindu moved Ahir clans to Yadav clans,[14] while HinduKshatrana is mentioning "Yadav" at the first sentence of this article.[15]
  • On Hindu Ghosi, HinduKshatrana mentions on lead that the subject traces origins to "Yaduvanshi Ahirs"[16] while KshatranaHindu removes mention of "Krishnavanshi" to keep it limited to "Yaduvanshi".[17]
  • Tag team edit war on Jadaun show 100% identical edits.[18][19]

 Looks like a duck to me. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 16:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HinduKshatrana/Archive&oldid=1084371849"