Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherry (band)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:18, 30 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:18, 30 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep due to meeting WP:MUSIC requirement of "has had a charted hit on any national music chart." ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cherry (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC. Top peak was somewhere in the 70s with no sources to prove that. Non notable what-so-ever. Undeath (talk) 16:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep So, were they formed in 1998, as the article says, or did they peak in the 70's, and the AfD nom says? References badly needed to establish something, anything, about this topic. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentWhen I say peaked, I meant the song peaked at somewhere in the 70s. Having one hit is not notable enough in my opinion. Especially when it did not even get within the top 20.Undeath (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The only claim to notability in the article is having a #78 hit in Australia, but this suggests it reached #46, which is more of a genuine hit. No album, nothing else to suggest notability. No coverage found. I'm guessing they would have at least received some coverage in Australia.--Michig (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as per Michig. There's enough to suggest some chart success and touring activity, although clearly the article needs work. Bondegezou (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think that top 50 is a pretty decent standard for what a hit is and as such this band is notable per WP:MUSIC. SorryGuy Talk 06:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.