User talk:Example555

How can there be a copyright on a photo that I took myself with a digital camera? Lets get real here! Why am I having such resistance with this page?

Image copyright problem with Image:Father Vernard 001.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Father Vernard 001.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Father Vernard Poslusney

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Father Vernard Poslusney which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. JuJube 04:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Father Vernard Poslusney, you will be blocked. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Father Vernard Poslusney

Hi, No I am not a child, thanks... You will find the rationale for the deletion of this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Father Vernard Poslusney. If you disagree with the decision, you can ask a review at the deletion review forum. -- lucasbfr ^talk 13:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit closed AfD discussion pages. If you wish to contest a decision that has been made, please see Wikipedia:Deletion review and make sure that this page fits their criteria. Please note that deletion review is not for all pages, however, and you may be best off simply trying to re-write the article in a user subpage. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 13:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 14:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 14:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review

Since you seem to be struggling with the process, I formatted the entry you were willing to paste for you. You can find it at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 October 30#Father_Vernard_Poslusney. I will comment there. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]