Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Souls Mudlib

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:44, 3 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Souls Mudlib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn piece of software. Sits tagged/neglected since 2011 - üser:Altenmann >t 21:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to George Reese (computer programmer) or delete. The programmer doesn't seem all that incredibly notable, but it's a perfectly legitimate redirection target. Some of these less-notable MUD-related articles could probably be merged into appropriate places. I don't see significant coverage of Dead Souls, and I'm not sure that there's going to be coverage of other mudlibs, either. A WP:VG/RS Google custom search comes up empty, and all the Google Books hits look like false positives to me. After getting that many irrelevant hits, I did give up a little earlier than I usually do, however. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 15:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.