Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WizFolio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WizFolio

No secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Looks like an advert. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like an advert; no evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find this article useful. It highlights the similarities and differences with other software. I suggest keeping this article. Chromide (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've still seen no evidence that this article is anything more than spam directly from the makers of the software. Since the software is known to be advertised through e-mail spam, I think the article needs to have more reputable sources and more objectivity to remain in Wikipedia. Rostovpack (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEPTo be fair, I looked at the entry carefully and it does not look like an ad to me. This version includes information not found in the software’s website. I did a further search and found that it is being used by a university in Singapore. (http://libpweb1.nus.edu.sg/web/appmanager/lib/desk?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=page_LION) ValerieAustin (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - just another software package...and a very new one at that. I cannot find any independant reviews, awards or non-PR press writing on it. Fails to be adequately verifiable - Peripitus (Talk) 10:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable software and promotion of company. Spam at best. §FreeRangeFrog 20:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.