Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phuket FantaSea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 02:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phuket FantaSea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't show notability. Seems to be a run-of-the-mill theme park. Google search brings up almost nothing besides passing mentions and the company website. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete – Some sources exist, but falls short of WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. The topic receives a lot of mentions, but significant coverage is sparse.~~ Some source examples are listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thailand's Islands & Beaches
Fodor's Thailand (1 ¶)

Comment for the closing administrator: I'd recommend salting this page, it keeps getting recreated (at least 2 times by the same user). Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's among the most prominent commercial tourist attractions in Phuket, and its business operations have been covered in-depth multiple times by the Manager magazine and newspaper,[1][2] as well as other news sources including The Nation.[3] --Paul_012 (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Struck my !vote above. Appears to meet WP:CORPDEPTH per sources provided above by Paul 012. Google Translate is not working to translate the entire Thai webpages for me, so I had to translate these pages long form by copy and pasting into Google Translate bits at a time, to avoid the "too many characters" error, but from what I've seen, the topic appears to meet CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.