Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Robert Downey, Jr. filmography/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 21 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 07:39, 28 October 2014 [1].
Robert Downey, Jr. filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is a good representation of his extensive and still growing career LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support very well-written and comprehensive, deserves to be FL. All my concerns were addressed during peer review. Downey himself would be quite proud :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Aww thanks Snuggums!!! LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- My pleasure :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Aww thanks Snuggums!!! LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Well-sourced and well-written list and it meets the criteria. --Carioca (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent prose in the lead section. A deserving candidate for FL status.--Skr15081997 (talk) 03:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: Whatcha say about promoting this? :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps later today. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There's also Hahc21, SchroCat, Giants2008, and NapHit who could promote it as well. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment from me, before promotion (well, after Cowlibob finishes reviewing): can we include a bit more variation? You use "appear" or a version of that word at least 8 times in the lead, and much of it reads as proseline (prosified lists). Better flow would be nice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I did a bit of tweaking. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be better now LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Good job overall. Slim pickings on this FLC.
|
- All sorted now. I now support this list. Another great job. Cowlibob (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.