Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Librex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Librex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actually PRODed once before by WikiDan61 but I also still confirm my own: Searches, including with its other name Hexatek, are not finding anything actually convincing and substantial, the listed sources here are either simply not convincing or unacceptable; there's still no substance for independent notability. There's still nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing GNG. Rebb ing 21:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no notability here. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.