Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Tai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Tai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article that has BLP-Prod removed twice by User:Adam9007 even though the guidelines state that sources must be reliable. The source are not reliable and are merely text. Fails WP:NACTOR, and subsequently fails WP:BIO. Not notable yet, although I suspect it's only a matter of time. scope_creep (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not BLP PROD eligible at the time of placement, but the point about the sources being mainly vanity and non-RS stands as a reason for deletion via AfD. Doesn't appear to have any noteworthy role in films, so he doesn't pass the guidelines yet. WP:TOOSOON. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I concur and the important part is also none of this amounts to substance including for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.