Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataFeedWatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DataFeedWatch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the PROD notice "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement." PROD tag was removed with no attempt to address these concerns. Calton | Talk 11:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW Delete as, not only a clear spam campaign, but they intentionally moved and reviewed it themselves, so this wasn't a casual advertisement; next, the sources are clear advertised spam, all in all nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 04:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.