Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartans Futsal Club
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:32, 25 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. no consensus on notability after three weeks JForget 00:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Spartans Futsal Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I've just declined the speedy on this, but I'm not convinced there's really enough there to pass through AfD. Don't seem to be a professional team, but I'm not very familiar with Futsal GedUK 05:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It is certainly not a professional team, as futsal is not played professionally in England, but this team does play at the highest level of English futsal, and professionalism is usually used as a standard of notability for individual players, with the bar for clubs being rather lower. However futsal has a much lower profile in England than in, say, Brazil or Spain, and I can find very little independent coverage of this club. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 06:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - a top-level team of an increasingly professional sport is notable in my eyes. GiantSnowman 06:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 01:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: may well play in the top division of English futsal, but the team has not received much coverage in the media so fails the WP:GNG. BigDom 08:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.