User talk:Darth Mike
Home | Talk | Sandbox |
This is Mike's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Mike. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
Archives:: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
RfC Invitation
Within the past month or so, you appear to have commented on at least one AN/I, RS/N, or BLP/N thread involving the use of the term "Saint Pancake" in the Rachel Corrie article. As of May 24th, 2009, an RfC has been open at Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Request_for_Comments_on_the_inclusion_of_Saint_Pancake for over a week. As editors who have previously commented on at least one aspect of the dispute, your further participation is welcome and encouraged. Jclemens (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Darth Mike! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Steve Vai / albums by genre category
Greetings. I reverted your category additions because they all go through [[Category:Steve Vai albums]], therefore bypassing the need to include genre-specific categories on the articles themselves. Hope that helps. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/80px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
Hi Darth Mike. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Darth Mike! Thanks for your help
Hi Darth Mike. I saw your comment on my article on Hornet. I'm new to wiki, so maybe you can help me. As I mentioned, I'm working the animation Stub on wiki. Later for example I want to update this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLIK_Amsterdam_Animation_Festival As you can see, this animation festival merged with another called Haff, and now they continue their mission together as Kaboom. See information below in their official website. Quoting below for easy access. https://www.kaboomfestival.nl/ourstory/
"Wait a minute, that sounds a lot like what KLIK and HAFF have been doing in the past decade. Are you plagiarizing them? I’m calling the cops.
Actually, Kaboom is the love child of these two animation festivals! In 2019, KLIK Amsterdam Animation Festival and Holland Animation Film Festival realized that their differences could be used to complement each other and propel themselves forward into the future. We decided to join hands and work on our shared, progressive goal of a brand-new animation festival that truly has it all. A yearly event where professionals and fans meet, inspire each other and enjoy the latest and greatest animation has to offer, all while celebrating the Dutch animation industry."
How can I modify this, and cite this info to comply with WP:42 and WP:GNG? Are this kind of links valid?
For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_(design_company), another Amsterdam animation company uses their own website as quote.
I would appreciate your help to understand this better. I really want to collaborate with the WikiProject Animation, but I would like to know how to do it correctly not to waste anybody's time. Thanks!!