Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meauma Petaia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meauma Petaia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Current reference in the article is a trivial mention at best. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG. --Angelo (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No independent, reliable sourcing of this stub. No evidence of notability. No suggestion that his level of play meets any extant notability criteria. A reliable source must be independent, AND reliable, AND provide significant coverage TO the subject in order to meet the GNG's standards. Ravenswing 21:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, no good sourcing. Fails WP:GNG PaulPachad (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.