Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Atlantic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Atlantic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, plus horrible formatting errors. Staglit (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the horrible formatting errors have been fixed but the lack of any evidence of notability remain.TheLongTone (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Ooo, just in time, review just in at Popscoop. No evidence of gig guides but have got some decently produced videos. I wasn't personally keen on the style of music but, as an attractive boy band, who knows. I think it was rough to delete without tagging the page or providing explanatory links here. Gregkaye (talk) 18:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 20:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of reliable third-party sourcing SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 14:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.