Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop Baptist School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hilltop Baptist School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost no coverage by independent reliable sources, and no independent refs on Google. Tube·of·Light 12:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Colorado. Tube·of·Light 12:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Name is too common to help find sources. It's been closed for over 10 yrs and no further sources are likely to turn up, no heritage register listings that I can see either. Oaktree b (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It looks like this article got blanked pretty hard, there was some information that got removed that turned the article into mostly a stub, but I'm not sure if that info was exactly proper for the article. ~XyNq^t_c 15:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -This diff appears to be the content removal mentioned above. I'm not going to restore it, because as it written it appears to violate BLP. But the sources indicate that the scandal content removed was directly causal to the school's closing, changing the nature of the scandal from sensational news we shouldn't cover to history, which we definitely should cover. With the sourcing for the removed content, this easily meets GNG. 174.212.228.43 (talk) 17:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per comments of User:XyNq and i.p. editor. Tag for rewriting. Should be re-expanded sensitively. This is significant history; record of what happens to schools upon a scandal as here, fairly or not, should be remembered. Also the scandal and then closure may have affected enrollments at other schools such as Colorado Springs Christian Schools (also up for deletion, and i !voted Keep) where it might be mentioned. --Doncram (talk) 02:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very clear that this article meets WP:GNG, just considering sources deleted from the article. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 00:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I carefully reinserted a very high-level picture of the sexual abuse case to the article. There are tons of sources on that, especially if you include the name of the perpetrator in the search. I have found very little about the school that is unrelated to the sexual abuse case. Jacona (talk) 09:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.