User talk:Lakes

/Archive 1

Tenryu

Why have you reverted the vitalstatistics?(Halbared 21:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well apart from the US (and aspects of the UK) the whole world uses metric as their primary system. I think it's looks sloppy to have a few stats a different way around, since this is an English speaking Wiki. But I'll leave it.(Halbared 09:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

UK stats

Should be in Imperial first. It is the most widely recognised form of weight and height measurement and is still used for our other athletes like boxers. If you go to a British wrestling event, they do not announce people in metric, they are announced in Imperial, please do not put metric first. The stats of British wreslters should be in Imperial (British) measurement first and then metric.(Halbared 22:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

That page doesn't say that he has dual nationality, but I'll leave it and take your word that it's in the shoot.(Halbared 15:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Punk's vice format

The reason I keep changing it is because the current format doesn't follow other previous finishers i.e. the ones listed in Kurt Angle, Fit Finlay or Edge. I realise that Punk is a special case with using the same name but a different move but it looks awkward. --- Lid 10:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reverse hurricanrana links to the reverse frankensteiner under throws rather than reverse frankensteiner under aerial. The distinction is for people to diffenciate that Punk does both the top rope and standing versions and that in modern wrestling the name frankensteiner is only ever used in the top rope version while it is in nearly every case referred to as a harracanrana rather than a frankensteiner. --- Lid 11:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RVDs Manuvers List

Why did you revert my edit to his manuvers list? Van Dam has done the diving leg drop as a finisher several times in ECW, finished a lot of great tag team matches with it, and yet you move it to a signature move. RVD has done a running leg lariat at the turnbuckle 2x so far, and it should be added. I labelled the superkick as a side kick because Tazz refers to it as a side kick, and if you didnt notice, in the superkick page, the superkick is also called a side kick. Im gonna put it back to the way i put it b4, and 1 more question, why is the split legged moonsault set as a hollywood star press 1st, then split legged moonsault after? Arent you supposed to label the current name in front of past names? Thats the way it is in Shelton Benjamin's page, so i think thats the way it should be labelled in the list. Also, i think it should just be called "Finishing and signature moves" instead of 2 seperate things, because some moves are used as BOTH finishing and signature, and people shouldnt be confused over if the split legged moonsault and diving leg drop is a current finisher, signature move, or BOTH. Just my opinion on the situation. I left something on the RVD Discussion page, so if you can answer my comments, answer it there until I get my talk page up and running. Thanks =). TJ Sparks 03:45, Sept. 21, 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 19:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Shark-Tsuchiya-chokes-Megumi-Kudo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shark-Tsuchiya-chokes-Megumi-Kudo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mixed martial arts article improvement drive

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts is now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive! Please add your input to decide what our first collaboration should be. VegaDark 21:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fujiwara-armbar.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fujiwara-armbar.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ura-nage

A lot of people have Ura-nage as a signature name for their side slam on TV. Be careful who you change that for. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 06:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is what they call it when they do it. It is like the Undertaker's Tombstone Piledriver being called that rather then a Belly to Belly Piledriver. It is just a name, and it should be left that way in spite of the move's actual name. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 13:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then Rey Mysterio's 619. Also, thanks for switching it back. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-inserted my citation tag, please provide a source. A Google search [1] backs up my requirement of a source. One Night In Hackney 14:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'd say "reverse side throw" is a better phrase to be honest though. Almost every judo site I've checked describes it as a reverse throw, so phrasing it the other way is very confusing. One Night In Hackney 15:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, just thought it more polite to get your opinion first, especially as we were discussing it. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 15:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

I've removed he insult. The anon has been blocked for incivility. However, please be careful of WP:3RR even in such cases William M. Connolley 10:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Is this warning for reaching three or four? Because I tried to not revert more than three times, and did the fourth ones after the user had been blocked. I understood this would be acceptable from Wikipedia:Three-revert rule#Reverting edits from banned or blocked users. ↪Lakes (Talk) 17:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to delete all of my pages?

I really don't appreciate how you are trying to basically delete every article I have created, it is really a low life thing to do. Kris Classic 01:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd notification

Not started by me! Right here, thought I'd let you know. One Night In Hackney 19:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can someone

can someone please help me keep my Nate Webb article from being deleted, i am trying to put up his official website but, it's on the blacklist, any idea that i can get it off?

Verdict

You cant just expect me to leave something just beacuse you say so, you aint nothing! and i havent done anything so stop being all over me with your little fingers here on this internet site.