Talk:Environmental, social, and governance

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business C‑class High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Environment C‑class Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics C‑class Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Ethics C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Climate change C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mobalatero, Razzinnari, ZHEN ZHU (RUTGERS), Seanmurray33.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Environmental, social and corporate governance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Concern

In addition to the tone flag on the article, I'm concerned this article has NPOV issues. ESG's are highly criticized amongst right wing and conservative organizations as being antithetical to capitalism. Compliance with the law, they often argue, is the duty firms have to shareholders and that ESG's inhibit the success of corporations.

I am not taking a stance on this. The lack of mentioning it however does not help the case that Wikipedia is unbiased and neutral.

See this article as evidence that there is a groundswell of opposition to ESGs. 107.77.213.68 (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just came over and was going to make the same point. For example, this sentence in the intro: "Research shows that such intangible assets comprise an increasing percentage of future enterprise value". That is definitely a matter of contention and this article shouldn't be claiming that. Beingafactoid (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

luizpuodzius

Poderias traduzir caso queira? Att 187.20.115.60 (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of opening paragraphs needed

This is Wikipedia, not some propaganda site. The first few paragraphs (if not the entire article) is written like a marketing piece rather than anything objective. 68.60.202.174 (talk) 07:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should be separated out as a "Precursors" or "Prehistory" section (or subsection of "History"), and "ESG" should not be suddenly blurted out in the middle of a lengthy rambling account, as if it were something already-there, when the whole point of history is to explain in detail: who made it, when was it made and recognized (instead of putting it in the opening paragraphs; where there should only be a simple note, e.g. "established by the US in 2004, the ESG is ..."). Additionally, even as a "Precursors" section, it still a bit one-dimensional, and shows a lack of research on related work or threads or cross-links, e.g. the "Goodwill" measure of accounting theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:AA00:747B:0:0:0:193B (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Is there a section for criticism? Mahie rahman (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]