User talk:L337m4n

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jschlatt (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jschlatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jschlatt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 16:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Squidward's Suicide

Hello, L33tm4n. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Squidward's Suicide".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

"Jeremy Robert Donaldson" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jeremy Robert Donaldson and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Jeremy Robert Donaldson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Twitch streamer stubs

A tag has been placed on Category:Twitch streamer stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (AustinShow) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

L337m4n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I followed WP:3RRNO exception #4: "Reverting obvious vandalism." The user has continuously vandalized AustinShow with unsourced (and unsupported) content that was rightfully challenged. L337m4n (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't see any WP:VANDALISM; content disputes are not vandalism. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

L337m4n (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

[removed]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [removed]. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Are you [removed]? bonadea contributions talk 12:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bonadea: I'm not sure if you made this whole monologue just so you could ask that question, but yes, I am, but I may no longer have access to that account.

I used to mess around on Wikipedia around half a decade ago. I have since learned more about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am more than happy to contribute constructive edits to the encyclopedia.

I decided to remove the conversation entirely because I never received a reply from NeilN; plus, it was kind of stupid of me to add it in the first place, considering the account is indefinitely blocked from editing.

Anyway, like I said, I am more than happy to contribute constructive edits to Wikipedia. :) L337m4n (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

this whole monologue – ha, I guess that notice is a bit of a mouthful; it is a templated notice, to ask about edits that are not vandalism but that look like they might be disruptive. I should have edited it a bit to remove the irrelevant parts. Thanks for explaining! Looks like you have been editing (mostly) constructively with this account for a couple of years and learning from your mistakes, and I can't see the benefit to Wikipedia to enforce an indefinite block from more than five years ago. But I believe that you should come clean about it to an admin, since you are in fact block evading. --bonadea contributions talk 09:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm afraid I've had to block this account; you'll need to request unblock at [removed], while logged into that account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bonadea and Jpgordon: Okay, thanks. L337m4n (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)