Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linbi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft delete. Given the lack of a change, and nature of participation, a soft delete seems wise, as consensus that notability is not currently met without a firm timeline on likely change. @Elmidae:, if you'd like me to recreate you a draft version immediately, I'm happy to do that, please let me know. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linbi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced stub about a non-notable collaborative project. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 11:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 11:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - this project appears to be just shy of publishing its final report (see roadmap here). That's the point at which one could expect some coverage in both the scientific and popular press, which might make a viable article. Currently independent coverage is too scant, although there is good primary material (e.g. [1]). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as of mid-November, the final report (slated for October) has not yet materialized, so it's unlikely that any third-party coverage will emerge earlier than a few months from now. That may be too long to have it sit in draft. Maybe soft-delete, to be revisited if/when material is available? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.