Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party for Independent Veneto

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Liz (talk | contribs) at 04:26, 4 September 2022 (→‎Party for Independent Veneto: Closed as merge (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Renato Martin. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Party for Independent Veneto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small party based in a city of 26,000 inhabitants (Jesolo) and which has never even participated in the local elections of this city (the electoral results indicated on the page refer to other civic lists led by Renato Martin). Irrelevant party that definitely doesn't meet WP:GNG. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 11:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A municipal party may have its own relevance, but not this one, which has never participated in an election. Same reasoning for Veneto Padanian Federal Republic. I agree to merge it with Renato Martin.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Leaning merge; more input needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:46, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Not even Renato Martin is among the most relevant politicians, however he was a discussed figure for his ties to Jörg Haider. The parties he founded, however, are really unknown, a merge/redirect would really be more than enough.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.