Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonu (cinematographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sonu (cinematographer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any sources on this person. The only sources that mention him are the first and the third sources (albeit in passing mentions, in the third source as "Kumar Avyaya"). Not sure if the first source is reliable. The other sources do not mention him. Having only worked on three films, he is yet to be notable per Wikipedia:Notability (people). The third source says this "Shot by cinematographers Ashok Meena and Kumar Avyaya, the images are always resonant, particularly the many night shots under a full moon", couldn't find any mention of him in other sources regarding the other two films. DareshMohan (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bihar. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The first relisting attracted no further opinions. It would be a shame if the second also attracted no opinions. Please consider the article, its references and the notability or otherwise of the subject and leave your policy based opinion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.