Talk:Kh-55

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Reportedly used in ukraine

Add that in a wars section?

https://t.me/chanel24/37464

- Kreyren (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kh-101

How would one create a separate article for the Kh-101? It has entirely different specifications and far vaster capacity than what is claimed in this wiki, and ther's already a detailed wiki on the Russian side. MicroBalrog (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translate article about https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Х-101 it's not like kh-55, it'something another, something new// https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Х-101 Different outfit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igzjX1IKULw (0:07) and huge amount of launched rockets (48 launches from tu-160 in 27-30 nov 2015 range)// 1:00, 06 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.108.195.143 (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

cruising altitude

either the altitude in meters or in feet is correct, can someone correct this please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.18.205.146 (talk) 21:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran

Who says Iran bought Kh-55's from Ukraine? Any sources (there's something wrong I can't open the given link)? thanks, Bogdan 20:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian government :-) - there's now a link to the FT article that broke the story. The one debatable one is whether two Kh-55's reached Pakistan at the same time - it seems a common meme but I can't track down a decent source for it.Le Deluge (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Features

The article says: "The small, winged [...]missile". Since the Kh-55 is later claimed to be over 8m long, I assume it is meant instead that the missile has small wings. Could someone clarify what was actually meant? Laschatzer (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warhead weight

How large is the payload —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.107.251 (talk) 22:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kh-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Kh-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for using reliable sources. In other places, the article suffers from Tass and Youtube citations.64.134.220.27 (talk) 06:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kh-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714202014/http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.112/pub_detail.asp to http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.112/pub_detail.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kh-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161010211453/http://vpk-news.ru/news/32818 to http://vpk-news.ru/news/32818

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the reported accuracy and reliability of missiles.

About the accuracy and reliability of missiles. A July 2022 study published by the Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies (UK) titled "Ukraine at War: Paving the Road from Survival to Victory" denies what the The International Institute for Strategic Studies says, with testimonies from Ukrainian military specialists. On page 21 it says (quote) "Briefings by the Pentagon have reported that a large number of Russian cruise missiles fail to either find their targets or malfunction and crash in ﬂight. As far as Ukrainian military scientists can determine, this is actually quite rare." (text highlighted by me). This source talks more about the topic and has references to other sources, I think it can be used in this and other articles. 152.207.201.170 (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]