User talk:CrnaGora

; Archives
	17 June 2005 - 26 December 2005 (As Dbalic); 27 December 2005 - 1 May 2006; 2 May 2006 - 8 June 2006; 9 June 2006 - 8 January 2007; 8 January 2007 - Present;

purge server cache | edit count | edit summary usage

Blocked

I never thought that I would block you, CrnaGora, but you were reported on WP:AIV and your recent edits (especially this one) could've led no other way. Please calm down, and think about getting back being the outstanding user you once were.--Húsönd 01:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notices

You are welcome to delete from your talk page, with the exception of administrator's notices. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bokelji

More than two thirds of the article are dirt. Either Serbian nationalist or other POV and there is AFAIC nothing much that's not at either Croats in Boka kotorska or Boka kotorska articles. There's really no need. I am going to include what little is worth saving, I can promise you that. --PaxEquilibrium 15:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Well, know that you have openly admitted many of your socks, why don't you write down all of them? :)

Come on, you wrote that those are all of your socks, when both you and I know that there're more. When you already decided to write them all down - do it. It might help you restore some of the prestige you had before the incidents. --PaxEquilibrium 21:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm? That's weird. I recall you admitted that you're yourself as several other users too. --PaxEquilibrium 12:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I wasn't referring to Olaf, but nm. You haven't done anything wrong through sockpuppets (I think). My reactions are harsh because I have became a sock-buster, most notably for rooting out Hahahihihoho, Afrika paprika, Dardanv, Bormalagurski and numerous other sock-puppeteers. Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 22:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, never mind. I got used to not revealing all cards at once. :) The easiest way to notice socks are their claims. For instance, if they have a particular claim (like Jagoda 1 and Evergreen Montenegro1 about Bosnians and Montenegrins being originally Croats) and write it in a particular manner, it is 99,99% certain that they're socks. --PaxEquilibrium 23:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (Hadzija I think) told me that Olaf is you. I don't want to spread bad faith, but I instantly believed him (both of you Muslim/Bosniac; both strong supporters of Milo Djukanovic, his Socialists and independists) and you have other similarities. --PaxEquilibrium 23:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's averagely the same number of Croats and Serbs in Australia (both a hundred thousand each). Although I think that Croats are slightly more numerous.

I suppose Ijekavica disappeared in Australia. --PaxEquilibrium 23:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey it is pity you left, you are better staying, behaving and contribute in a proper manner. Buffadren 14:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:S-D PA Screentshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:S-D PA Screentshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. My user page

Unprotected
Good to see you're back. Welcome back. :-) Regards, Húsönd 03:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, perhaps you should consider erasing the message on the top of your talk page? Húsönd 03:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wl sf beta screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wl sf beta screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:PinkMTop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PinkMTop.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Comics Collaboration of the Month

You supported Marvel Comics, which has been selected as the Comics WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Steve block Talk 19:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

It was fun (silently) collaborating with you on Knežević. Have a nice day! Jerry lavoie 23:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dedeic, Vujanovic & Djukanovic

...were all fierce Serbian nationalists a long time ago (and considered themselves Serbs). But the controversy is that that's no longer the case today. Perhaps you find a balanced solution? --PaxEquilibrium 00:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Would you be so kind as to translate this for me?

Ustašoidi u akciji

Želim te upozoriti, da korisnik Ivan Kricancic, pogledaj njegovu korisničku stranicu u svom suludom fanatizmu ide od slike do slike koja si teče Bosne i predlaže je za brisanje. Često to radi nepotpisan: 58.165.115.192. Znam da je sa šupcima teško, ali degen je bolestan i na taj način je izbrisao mnoge članke na Srebrenici. Emir Arven 08:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. —King Ivan 09:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gusle

Look at the article about gusle, I think there's a need for Montenegrin touch. It seems to me that someone puts together (at least on links) Montenegrin gusle and Serb gusle.
I could react, but I'd rather leave that reaction for Montenegrins themselves. Kubura 09:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suradnik & Milo Djukanovic and his crimes

Just to inform you, I don't think that the Montenegrin language will use "Suradnik" instead of "Saradnik". We've just had a discussion over it down at the Montenegrowiki Test Project.

I've just found out that some time ago that the Sanjak Bosniacs/Muslims were in remorse for the victims of Djukanovic's regime. Now I now that you pride yourself as of Albanian origin, rather than Slavic (of Sandzak), but I think you should care at least a bit, considering that you too are a Muslim. It's very shocking (to me and actually, it should be to you too) that you still devoutly support a Criminal that was your own enemy... --PaxEquilibrium 18:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Wallachia.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Wallachia.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Petar II Petrovic-Njegos

CrnaGora, what are you doing?

If you meant to make it more readable to foreigners - foreigners can't speak Serbian anyway. It's somewhat silly to combine Latin & Njegos's quotes as the two cannot be mixed. You get a lit'le bizarre thing. The quotes are took directly from his works, and its no such case after you transliterated them into Latin. Why did you do that?

Anyone who can't read Cyrillic, can't read Njegos anyway, so if you meant to make it more readable, you should've translated it to English.

May I revert your edit? --PaxEquilibrium 18:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to translate it anyway. As the matter of fact, I have translated a part of it last night, but some error occured when I hit save page so I guess I will have to redo it sometime soon. Cheers. Sideshow Bob 20:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, bad luck man!

You should try out what I do: typing a lot of text in Word or Notepad and always saving it. Cheers (both of you). --PaxEquilibrium 00:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! GLORY TO INDEPENDENT STATE OF MONTENEGRO!!!!!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why don't you add some Croatian to your userpage to reflect the Zagreb-Podgorica/Cetinje status?