User talk:FierakuiVërtet
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
You deserve this, I can't thank you enough. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks! I appreciate it:) FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
EvergreenFir (talk) 04:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Btw Albwiki still is making false claims about you (and me), basically look at his talk page. S.G ReDark (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
@S.G ReDark: Yes, I saw that. But, he is being ridiculous, especially regarding Berisha's page. That is why I am not replying to him. The good thing is that administrators and other editors can see that we are right.FierakuiVërtet (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Abuse edit summaries
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, you may be blocked from editing. Alexikoua (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This "warning" is a joke because the one who is disruptive editing it is you. I've always put an edit summary.
Remember that Wipedia's articles are free and nobody owns them. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
That user seems familiar
Hello FierakuiVërtet, how have you been? I believe I'm not the only to "notice" this but someone with a familiar "edit pattern" showed up in Edi Rama page. S.G ReDark (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I saw it. But I don't think it's him because these IP are located in Italy. Type the two IP adresses here [1]. In fact, if you have a look at Rama's article in italian wiki you can see they did the same problematic edits.[2] It seems to me they're Italian native speakers, therefore they could be Albanians living in Italy. Instead the other user was an English native speaker... Obviously they could be using a VPN but I don't think so.
If I miss something tell me:) FierakuiVërtet (talk) 05:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey FierakuiVërtet, sorry to reply this late! I haven't been online that much recently, anyway you did a great detective work haha S.G ReDark (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I understand, don't worry about it:) FierakuiVërtet (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Rama
Read the sources first and stop removing content about Edi Rama and other Albanian politicians you like. Thanks you. 87.11.88.149 (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- I am an editor on Italian Wikipedia and I've already provided to you my argumentation. You must need consensus on the talk page for such edits, which have not an encyclopedic value and aim to defamate a politician with chit-chat. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
About the Margariti article
Hello @FierakuiVërtet. First off, thank you for reviewing my change to the Margariti article. The region remained under Ottoman rule for a long time. For this reason, the region was given an Ottoman name and this name is mentioned in many documents. That's why I think it should be a Turkish name. In addition, Turkish is Ottoman Turkish written in the Latin alphabet. Mustafa MVC 18:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Dittatore
Ho visto che sei attivo pure nella versione in lingua italiana, dove ti hanno bloccato per la tua guerra editoriale sulla qualifica "dittatore" e qui ti ostini a eliminare "dictator", ma Enver Hoxa fu un dittatore così come Josip Broz Tito e tutti lo sanno come viene spiegato in dictatorship dove la foto di Hoxa al posto di Josip Broz è stata sostituita da un utente serbo-croato, che si ostina a mettere la qualifica "dictator" per Benito Mussolini ma non per il criminale Josip Broz! La qualifica storicamente corretta per entrambi in lingua inglese è "criminal dictators" e se tu o quel serbo-croato volete essere cacciati da questo progetto, siete entrambi sulla strada che vi porterà al blocco totale. Tutti i dittatori comunisti furono e sono dei criminali come è documentato su tonnellate di libri in tutte le lingue! Se tu vivi in Italia, vai in una biblioteca e leggiti qualche libro che riporta i numeri dei morti ammazzati dai criminali Broz e Hoxa. Forza bruta (talk) 20:44, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Forza bruta you can't get your way through on Wikipedia by intimidating everyone you disagree with. Take it to the talk page of the article like requested by the person who reverted you. -Vipz (talk) 23:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
This is your opinion, but Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. We just report the facts. Besides, I already replied to you with my edit summary. If you want to discuss this topic (already discussed) further more open a section in Enver Hoxha talk page. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Assume good faith
Please read WP:GOODFAITH and WP:OWN. I have tried to work with you and you have at least found a source for the overall literacy rate to correct the originally misrepresented literacy rate but I really don't appreciate being accused of bad faith edits with nonsensical accusations of trying to mislead the reader on who is being persecuted. It's insulting. I'm not going to further engage with the Enver Hoxha article if you're going to essentially own the article and not assume good faith on my part. GreenCows (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've already proposed to you that we talk about it on talk page (wp:consensus). I understood your doubts about the literacy rate and provided a source. But, why did you changed the part which talks about who was persecuted? The way you put it is misleading. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- @GreenCows I forgot to ping you. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- I saw your changes to the paragraph to add a mention of executions and exiles as I had done in the first place. Now I think the paragraph is good as it is. In the future, please be more careful when accusing an editor of bad faith because in my case that was clearly incorrect. GreenCows (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:FierakuiVërtet reported by User:Khirurg (Result: ). Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 16:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Moderate your language
Moderate the language you use against other editors unlike you did here. You already got blocked two times for similar behavior. Next time I won't be so patient with such language. Bes-ARTTalk 23:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)