Jump to content

Talk:Strange World (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 109.77.205.15 (talk) at 03:20, 27 November 2022 (→‎Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2022). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ready to Move?

The first teaser for the film was released today. An official poster is also out. I think this is ready to move to the mainspace. Hummerrocket (talk) 14:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poster

A teaser poster for the film can be found online and can be used for this article. Red4Smash (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2022

Update the external IMDB title link:

To the ID that the IMDB website now redirects to:

Done. --Mvqr (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2022

Remove "The film's marketing has been called out for being poor." SMT2002 (talk) 17:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
I think I'll remove it. I couldn't find any reliable sources that support this, and it's poorly worded in the first place.
Three non WP:RS sources I could find plus one Reddit discussion (again, not a usable source, so I'll remove the passage for not having any WP:V sources.)
https://insidethemagic.net/2022/10/movie-critic-calls-out-disney-strange-world-jc1/
https://thatparkplace.com/bros-colossal-failure-has-disneys-strange-world-creators-panicking/
https://www.disneydining.com/film-critic-says-disney-does-not-know-how-to-market-original-films-ks1/
https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/ymewtd/has_disney_failed_to_market_strange_world/ BhamBoi (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2022

From: "The film has received generally positive reviews from critics"

To: "The film has received mixed reviews from critics".

Source/ Evidence: rotten tomatoes summarized critic responses: "this dazzlingly animated adventure offers little audiences haven't already seen". Score of 65 on meta critic also confirms mixed reviews. Jeffer4646 (talk) 01:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Metacritic clearly says reviews were positive. [1] We could discuss and maybe if the sheer number and weight of reviews from Rotten Tomatoes justified it then we could change it but it would be better to get local consensus for that change in advance before we go contradicting what the reliable source Metacritic says. -- 109.77.205.15 (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]