User talk:Rtkat3

; Archives
	06/2/05 - 12/28/05; 1/04/06 - 12/29/06; 1/04/07 - 12/31/07; 1/03/08 - 12/08/08; 1/11/09 - 12/30/09; 1/07/10 - 12/29/10; 1/03/11 - 12/31/11; 1/01/12 - 12/31/12; 1/03/13 - 12/31/13; 1/01/14 - 12/25/14; 1/01/15 - 12/31/15; 1/01/16 - 12/31/16; 1/11/17 - 12/26/17; 1/04/18 - 12/26/18; 1/02/19 - 12/27/19; 1/02/20 - 12/25/20; 2/01/21 - 12/26/21; 1/08/22 - 12/28/22;

Welcome to my Talk page! If you have any comments or questions, send them here. Below is my archive pages.

Happy New Year, Rtkat3!

Happy New Year!

Rtkat3,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Moops. I know this is late, but thanks for this message. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not late at all by my book. :) TY for the kind reply. :) — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 14:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"History teacher" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect History teacher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § History teacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snowflake, the White Gorilla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snowflake, the White Gorilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowflake, the White Gorilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Film Creator (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultra City Smiths (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultra City Smiths and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rtkat3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krakoa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krakoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakoa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Nekivik (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]