Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Petrovic (extreme athlete)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BusterD (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandar Petrovic (extreme athlete)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a blocked sock; I find no coverage for this individual and I'm thinking the "awards" won are not notable. There is a similar person that's head of the basketball federation in Serbia, who isn't this person. Oaktree b (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Montenegro and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The nom is wrong on several counts. The article was created by an IP through AFC, and subsequently edited by a possible COI account Akvabajk (talk · contribs) back in 2013. The sources in the article seem legitimate and include coverage in Blic [1], NBC Florida [2] and Huffington Post [3]. Now, this is all borderline, and Aquabike World Championship (powerboating) is a niche discipline, but his medals there are legit [4], as can be verified by other sources. I think that this is on the verge of GNG and NBASIC bar, but your mileage may vary. No such user (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No SIGCOV in any quality RS outside of niche blogs. Definitely also a paid-for article. This will need SALT I suspect. 31.187.2.233 (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources on google, most results are stats.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 05:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.