Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hafiz al Millat Mufti Abdul Aziz Ashrafi Muhaddith Mubarakpuri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hafiz al Millat Mufti Abdul Aziz Ashrafi Muhaddith Mubarakpuri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simple textbook failure of WP:GNG. Like a huge proportion of articles on South Asian Muslim religious figures, this is just a long, poorly written personal reflection essay on a non-notable local cleric the article's author - always a non-native speaker of English who can't write well - admires. Various other peacock terms, honorifics (even in the title) and wondrous anecdotes fit the description of one of these typically disastrous articles on non-notable subjects. As can be seen at the talk page of the article creator, the same individual has already had two other such articles on religious figures from the region deleted, so even the pattern is there. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, per WP:TNT as a minimum as the current article looks like "hopelessly irreparable". An unsourced, orphan, poorly written and poorly formatted, sometimes obscure essay-like text full of peacockery about this obscure, unverifiable figure who could even be a hoax (no GoogleHits outside a dozen WP mirrors). Cavarrone 09:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article provides no references, let alone any reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 03:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Searches revealed nothing which meets notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.