Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus despite the fact that this AfD ran for 2 weeks. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kreia[edit]

Another lackluster Star Wars character article which consists of little more than an extended in-universe plot summary and a lack of evidence of notability. I counted only 4 out-of-universe sentences when I examined. Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 03:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shorten it down, first off. I think the Gamespy Award would lend some notability, so perhaps keep. J-ſtan^Contribs_{User page} 04:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of KOTOR characters, and merge that nugget about the best-baddie recognition in the KOTOR2 article. --EEMIV (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 20:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 20:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic characters. There's some potentially decent stuff in here, but the rest is just WP:FANCRUFT. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 21:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a very long article violating the two key points of Wikipedia:FICTION#Defining_notability_for_fiction. As a non-fan, this article isn't very comprehensible. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It requires a lot of cleaning up, I'll admit, but a lot of the KOTOR characters have their own pages, and this character is pretty important in the storyline. She deserves her own article, deletion shouldn't be an issue. Just get someone to clean it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.10.161.88 (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.