Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Škoda Joyster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SheepLinterBot (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 4 February 2023 ([[Škoda Joyster]]: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shame. Looked kind of cool, judging by the pictures. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Škoda Joyster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article relates to a car whose prototype seems to have been 'introduced' in 2006, yet there are no apparent updates to the info. presented. This to me suggests that the car was long(?)-since abandoned. Trafford09 (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the car is successfully launched next year then an article can be created about it after the launch. filceolaire (talk) 16:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 08:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, re-write

There is plenty of information on the Škoda Joyster with a quick search query. However, the article may need to be re-written to announce that nothing has come of this project, or would that count as original research?

Either way, there is more than enough information on this car out there to say that it exists, and should have an article on it. Solntsa90 (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.