Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MVEL Language Guide
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and transwiki to WikiSource. (I take it it's been moved to WikiSource, but I'm happy to provide a copy of the deleted article on request if that hasn't been done.) j⚛e deckertalk 14:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- MVEL Language Guide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; allegedly "valuable information" in the form of a guide or manual but does not belong in Wikipedia. Perhaps Wikisource. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Moved To WikiSource Jamesont (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Reformatted and indented. APerson (talk!) 18:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Belongs on Wikisource - maybe. Certainly doesn't belong here. Fails WP:NOTGUIDE. APerson (talk!) 18:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: belongs at Wikisource; adopt @APerson rationale. Quis separabit? 13:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.