Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adebola Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adebola Williams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 22:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sources to pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject is the primary focus of the Forbes article in the references. Ifnord (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Single interview source simply isn't enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to merit a Wikipedia biography. We can't write a biographical article based on a single interview. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks like there are enough WP:RS for this online. Founder and related notability on Red Africa seems notable enough for inclusion on the wiki. Needs some TLC to improve sources and getting it up to snuff. Shaded0 (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep subject seems notable per WP:ANYBIO ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep found a few reliable sources [1] [2] [3] which makes the subject meet WP:GNG. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sufficient coverage in reliable sources for me. Antrocent (♫♬) 23:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.