Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Powers (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Powers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations; and notability under PORNBIO is not inherited from simply appearing in a video which wins an award. No independent reliable sourcing. No biographical content. Little more than a list of credits in nn films. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC) The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable prornographic actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete and salt No ta, source it or lose it. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with nominator's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 09:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The nominator is correct. Fails PORNBIO with only nominations for non-notable awards. No coverage by reliable sources to pass GNG. Porn trade press coverage is limited to cast listings. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt - Recreated page that still fails WP:PORNBIO. -- Dane2007 ^talk 18:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Concerned by the complete reversal from the previous AFD. Giving this one more time for any additional editors to weigh in. Jujutacular (talk) 02:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability and clearly fails GNG. Salt is an appropriate suggestion as this article has been discussed too many times. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- in the last AfD, the voters were apparently swayed by the argument that the subject "passes PORNBIO due to multiple nominations in multiple years". "Multiple nominations" is no longer part of PORNBIO, where actual wins in significant and well-known awards are needed to meet it. Regardless, the subject fails GNG, which PORNBIO is not exempt from. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.