Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attorney at law (Sri Lanka)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:04, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:04, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 07:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Attorney at law (Sri Lanka)[edit]
- Attorney at law (Sri Lanka) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No source to be found actually talking about Sri Lankan attorneys. Ipatrol (talk) 23:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If there is anything about Sri Lankan attorneys that is different than about those in the rest of the world, this article just doesn't mention it. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Refs added. The legal practice defers from country to country so too the attorneys.Cossde (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge if a better place for this information can be found. It's a bit of a vague article at the moment, but information on how you qualify as a solicitor in a country is sufficiently notable to warrant a mention somewhere - the only question is whether it is here or in another article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't it be better, then, to move the article to Judicial system of Sri Lanka (which happens to be a redlink within the article we are discussing here)? -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as valid stub. Jenuk1985 | Talk 20:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - easy to rescue, an encyclopedic law stub, perfectly good start to something better, per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Very encyclopedic. It may be worth considering refactoring the set of articles about Sri Lankan law and linking it all together with a series or category. Jwray (talk) 09:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and tag for expansion. The strange habits of the attorney trade differ greatly from country to country. How they must perform their duties in Sri Lanka will certainly prove to be as worthy of inclusion in this and subsequent articles in how differing legal systems require the practice in different countries. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.