Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajót.z

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Article already deleted at 15:22 on 5 April 2016 by Bishonen (talk · contribs) "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria A3, A7" (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 23:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bajót.z[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Should be speedied, but creator and then SPAs have been removing speedy tags. ubiquity (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Infobox aside, the content of the article only restates the name (WP:A3); there is no credible claim of significance (WP:A7); and the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for bands. --Erick Shepherd (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedied. I don't think repeated removal of the (very reasonable) speedy template ought to entitle the creator to the full pomp of AfD. Bishonen | talk 15:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Comment, this is clearly a Yalexandrov creation, and speedy was the best move. GAB^Hello! 16:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.