Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BanG Dream!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:52, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fool's is over. (non-admin closure) Aasim 02:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BanG Dream![edit]

BanG Dream! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a loyal and dedicated Love Live! fan, it sickens me that this upstart franchise is stealing our beloved franchise's fans. We must delete the BanG Dream! menace from existence and return Love Live! to its rightful place at the top of the idol franchise food chain. Kasumi and Lisa still best girls though. [April Fools!] Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as flick notes suck and round buttons are more readable.   Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 04:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fleeting Keep (not sure if the fleeting joke works) - BanG Dream! is clearly superior to Love Live, which is a franchise that must know its place. Instead of having idols who just sing and dance, BanG Dream girls are in bands, which is much better than this idol group stuff. Also, it has better ships and Baby Shark. As Love Live fans, you should be turning your attention towards the real evil, IDOLM@ASTER. I mean, hell, the two franchises have both got idols! Roniius (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.