Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Hill (photographer)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:27, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:27, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben Hill (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a non-notable photographer and business man. Have looked for sources but can find none.Jenafalt (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Jenafalt (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find significant coverage of this photographer. Jujutacular T · C 21:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this photographer. Joe Chill (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't appear to pass WP:CREATIVE, due to a lack of significant coverage by reliable third parties. Cocytus [»talk«] 03:48, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.