Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Nemtin
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:29, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:29, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben Nemtin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet basic WP:N requirements, known only for fairly low-key MTV tv series, no notable awards, no significant news coverage as an individual. — raekyt 03:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)}[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:FILMMAKER. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. New York Times #1 bestselling author plus creator-producer of well-known MTV series. Article needs expansion, but notability is there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyHillbilly (talk • contribs) 05:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Is not, in fact, even the author of a book. Qworty (talk) 10:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and allow continued improvements to this stub. WP:AUTHOR does not refer to only authors of books, but is set to address creative individuals in general. As the MTV show The Buried Life , "major" or not, has established notability enough to merit a Wikipedia article, it can be argued that this person, as creator, executive producer and cast member of the show, meets WP:CREATIVE. And the book What Do You Want to Do Before You Die? IS a book, DID make the New York Times Bestseller list,[1] and WAS in fact co-authored by Nemtin,[2] so a claim that it is not a book or that Nemtin had no part in its creation is patently incorrect. As a book itself receiving coverage in multiple reliable sources,[3] the book meets the standards set at WP:NBOOK per WP:BKCRIT and the "author" portion of guideline and WP:NBOOK is met. And oh... we have the individual himeself being the recipient of coverage in multiple reliable sources... another point in his favor.[4] I see an improvable stub on a notable topic. I do not see anything that requires deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.